Effective Microorganisms (EM) in Sustainable Agriculture

Rapid human population growth leads to substantial development in agriculture production. Thus, large amounts of synthetic products are used to meet the demand for increased agricultural production. However, heavy usage of chemicals, pesticides, and antibiotics creates a burden on the environment, destroys the micro-fauna and flora in the soil, and causes threats to animals and human health. Therefore, sustainable agriculture production has gained global interest. In many ways, the application of effective microorganisms (EM) plays a vital role in sustainable production and has been widely spread throughout the world.

The EM is a fermented mixed culture of naturally occurring species of beneficial microorganisms that includes photosynthetic bacteria, lactobacilli, yeast, and actinomycetes in an acidic medium. After the concept of EM was initiated, different fertilizer manufacturing companies developed EM solutions to enhance crop production. This is an area where research and development activities are also abundant for long-term and short-term crop production. Promoting germination, flowering, fruiting, and ripening in plants; improving the physical, chemical, and biological environments of the soil, and suppressing soil-borne pathogens and pests; enhancing the photosynthetic capacity of crops and nitrogen fixation; ensuring better germination and plant establishment, increasing the efficacy of organic matter as fertilizer; and accelerating the decomposition of organic waste are some examples where EM could be used to gain an economic advantage in crop production. In the commercial use of EM, it could be found under different brand identities.

EM is eco-friendly, safe, organic and contains active microbes. EM solution is different from all the other agrochemicals in activity and composition. It is not necessary to put on goggles, masks, or protective clothing when spraying effective microorganisms. At the same time, effective microorganisms never pollute water systems. EM is considered mainly of the synthesizing type, which imparts beneficial effects on agriculture and environmental processes by generating a wide variety of bioactive substances. Since EM is easy to decompose after use, it never pollutes groundwater. Instead, it purifies soil, groundwater, lakes, and rivers, thereby reducing environmental burdens. The effective microorganism is compatible with various methods of farming, regardless of their scale.

However, some experiments reported that EM gives the best results when a natural imbalance of microorganisms has occurred and, in situations where the natural microorganism population is balanced and agricultural inputs are available, the addition of EM does not make a significant difference. Another argument emerging by scientists is the fact that applying EM to soil alters the natural chemical composition of the soil, displacing native microorganisms and nutrients, which may be harmful to the survival of native plant species Thus, and more research should be directed towards this aspect.

Advancements in the EM concept have paved the path to substitute synthetic products. Achieving sustainability in agriculture production using EM is directed basically to reducing the production cost, maximizing the profit, and protecting the environment, human and animal health.

References
Higa, Teruo (2001) ‘Effective Microorganisms in the context of Kyusei Nature Farming: a technology for the future’, in Proceedings of the conference on greater productivity and a cleaner environment through Kyusei Nature Farming, pp. 40–43.

Olle, M., and Williams, I. H. (2013). Effective microorganisms and their influence on 47 vegetable production–a review. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 88(4), 380–386.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://img.freepik.com/free-photo/womans-hands-gloves-planting-young-plant_1157-37097.jpg?w=740&t=st=1665833048~exp=1665833648~hmac=5b3d8e68b3b3599a1baee366ebaa76687d7fe38c8938fe3a107f15648152496e

Assembly of Microbial Community to the Improvement of Disease Resilience in Plants

Plants host diverse communities of microorganisms, also known as the microbiome, which colonizes various parts of host plants such as the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and endosphere. The microbiome includes protists, fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes, etc. This highly complex assemblage of microorganisms has an important role in plant growth and health as well as in improving the productivity of crops by forming complex co-associations with plants. The plant-associated microbial communities confer multiple beneficial advantages to their host plants through nutrient acquisition, growth promotion, pathogen resistance, and environmental stress tolerance. Nowadays, a considerable amount of information is available on the structure and dynamics of the plant microbiome. The functional capacities of the isolated microbes have been identified using novel technologies.

The world population is estimated to rise to 9.5 billion by 2050, leading to high food demand. The availability of limited fertile land, urbanization, and climate change are some of the major constraints for the productivity of many crops. In addition, plants are subject to various biotic and abiotic stresses that limit their growth and productivity. The potential of the plant-associated microbial community to overcome biotic and abiotic stresses in plants can be interlinked to mitigate the current challenges in food security. For this, there is an urgent need to bring microbial innovations into practice.

Microbiome engineering is an emerging biotechnological strategy to improve the functional capabilities of native microbial species under biotic and abiotic stresses. It is a win-win strategy where both humans and the environment are benefited by improving crop yield and soil health. Conditioning the soil using suitable amendments, cultivating microbe-recruiting plant cultivars (host-dependent microbiome engineering), and inoculating synthetic microbial communities are microbiome approaches which improve plant health under stress conditions by increasing the functionally active and diverse microbial communities.

Figure 1 - Different microbiome engineering approaches

Figure 1 – Different microbiome engineering approaches

Traditional soil organic formulations such as compost, organic residues, organic waste, and peat can be used to support the growth and activation of beneficial soil microbes. Plant-oriented signaling molecules such as salicylic acid and metabolites in root exudates have a strong effect on the dynamics and the composition of the microbiome. It was suggested that these microbe-stimulating compounds can be artificially modulated and can be used as the soil conditioners.

Artificial microbial consortia (AMC) can also be used to improve the multiple functions relevant to crop plant growth and development. This strategy is the best alternative to solve the drawbacks of traditional bio fertilizers. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and AM fungi can also be artificially inoculated into soils to alter the structure of microbial communities. For example, inoculating chili plant roots with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Acinetobacter sp. and Bacillus velezensis have promoted the growth of chili plants and have shown the disease suppressive ability against Phytophthora capsica. Genetic engineering is also leading to the development of host-specific bio fertilizers.

References
Noman, M.; Ahmed, T.; Ijaz, U.; Shahid, M.; Azizullah; Li, D.; Manzoor, I.; Song, F. Plant–Microbiome Crosstalk: Dawning from Composition and Assembly of Microbial Community to Improvement of Disease Resilience in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136852

Albright, M.B.N., Louca, S., Winkler, D.E. et al. Solutions in microbiome engineering: prioritizing barriers to organism establishment. ISME J 16, 331–338 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01088-5

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://www.farmersnational.com/Blog/Agricultural_Real_Estate/What_is_the_Best_Auction_Method_for_Selling_Land/

Figure 1 – Noman, M.; Ahmed, T.; Ijaz, U.; Shahid, M.; Azizullah; Li, D.; Manzoor, I.; Song, F. Plant–Microbiome Crosstalk: Dawning from Composition and Assembly of Microbial Community to Improvement of Disease Resilience in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136852

Microbes as Biological Control Agents

Biological control of plant pathogens is referred to as controlling disease causing organisms (pests) such as insects, mites, and weeds; using another beneficial organism. This is one of the best sustainable methods of plant disease management, instead application of agrochemicals.

The use of chemicals is a major practice of controlling pathogens in today’s world, to address the issue of losing crop quantity and quality due to plant diseases. Pesticides, insecticides, weedicides, and fungicides are the main types of agrochemicals used during crop cultivation and post-harvest management of food products. So far, chemicals have achieved a high rate of success in controlling plant pathogens, but it always comes at a cost.

Environmental problems and health related problems are the direct costs of using agrochemicals. Other than that, chemicals produce resistant pathogens making their control even more challenging.

This has created a requirement for sustainable disease control mechanisms to make sure that the present and the future of food production are in a safe zone, to feed the skyrocketing human population.

Fungus, bacteria, viruses, or a mixture of two or more microorganisms are used to control pathogenic organisms. Microbial biological control agents act via a range of modes of action in controlling pathogens.

Some microbial biological control agents compete with pathogenic microbes for nutrients, habitat, or optimum growth conditions. Obligate biotrophic pathogens infect living host cells and do not depend on nutrients from the outside environment. Necrotrophic pathogens kill the host tissues and utilize the available nutrients in them. Whereas some other pathogenic microbes depend on exogenous nutrients where they have to compete with other microbes. If the microbiome is already invaded by a biocontrol beneficial microbe with good genetical potential, the pathogen has to compete to colonize. Currently, recombinant DNA technology is used to develop such biological control agents with several beneficial characteristics.

Antagonists acting through hyper-parasitism and antibiosis directly interfere with the pathogen. Hyperparasites invade and kill mycelium, spores, and resting structures of pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Such interactions between pathogens and biological control agents are regulated through various metabolic functions. Compounds such as enzymes, different signaling molecules, antibiotics, and other antimicrobial metabolites are produced when the biocontrol agent interacts with the pathogen. Production of secondary metabolites with anti-pathogenic properties at low concentrations in situ supports biological control agents to obtain a competitive advantage to colonize, absorb nutrients, and thereby, spread their colonies.

Highly effective microbes against pathogens can be selected to culture them on artificial media to be utilized at a mass scale during the growing season once or several times. Biocontrol products that are manufactured commercially by companies sometimes contain living microbes. On the other hand, some biocontrol products only contain antimicrobial metabolites extracted by biological control agents. In most cases, antimicrobial metabolites are produced by antagonists directly on the spot where the pathogenic target is present, so screening such antimicrobial products can only be done when the correct target interacts with the biocontrol agent.

It is expected that complex chemical communication happens within and in between microbiomes and plants including the contribution of signaling by microbial biocontrol agents to the continuous chemical crosstalk between organisms in the environment. It helps in inducing resistance in plants (MAMP triggered immunity) so that the pathogen is defended with a selective pressure and the pathogen may have to overcome to cause the disease in the host plant.

The future of microbial biocontrol agents depends mostly on better screening assays for finding the next generation with more capabilities to address the issue of less productivity of polluted and chemically treated land. Biological remediation of dumped and polluted lands is the hope of not only microbial biocontrol agents, but also all the beneficial microbes. Multi-omics for a better understanding of complex events in the microbial world can make the use of microbes in a correctly defined manner so that maximum efficiency is obtained.

Reffernces
Teixidó, N., Usall, J. et al. (2022). Insight into a Successful Development of Biocontrol Agents: Production, Formulation, Packaging, and Shelf Life as Key Aspects. Horticulturae, 8(4), 305.

Velivelli, S. L., De Vos, P. et al. (2014). Biological control agents: from field to market, problems, and challenges. Trends in Biotechnology, 32(10), 493-496.

Lahlali, R., Ezrari, S. et al. (2022). Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms, 10(3), 596.

Köhl, J., Kolnaar, R. et al. (2019). Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: relevance beyond efficacy. Frontiers in plant science, 845.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kwenti-Emmanuel-Tebit/publication/318324523/figure/fig1/AS:514977559990272@1499791626364/Images-of-some-common-parasites-pests-centre-cycle-and-biological-control-agents.png

White Fly Attack and Future of Coconut Cultivation

Coconut (Cocos nucifera ) is one of Sri Lanka’s three major export crops, bringing home a total revenue of US$537.62 million in 2014. Known for its great versatility, the coconut tree is one of the most important plants in Sri Lanka.

The Sri Lankan lifestyle has been inextricably intertwined with the Coconut tree, not just for the milk, water, and oil-giving nuts, but for the leaves, the trunk, and the fibrous husk that surrounds the coconut. There is no part of the coconut tree that goes to waste in a Sri Lankan household. There are three types of coconuts in Sri Lanka: tall coconuts, dwarf coconuts, and King coconuts.According to figures published in December 2018 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, it is the world’s fourth largest producer of coconuts, producing 2,623,000 tonnes in 2018. Because of the value of the coconut in Sri Lanka, it is named “Kapruka”, which means the crop gives every wish.

In all but the upper elevations of Sri Lanka, coconut palms are found. It is a demanding, sturdy, and light tree. In the triangle created by Puttalam, Kurunegala, and Gampaha, the coconut is primarily found. The Coconut-Triangle is the name given to the region in which these three settlements are located.

Figure 1 - Coconut tree

Figure 1 – Coconut tree

Coconut Whitefly (Aleurodicus cocois) damage
This insect is known in Sri Lanka by various names, such as powdery mildew, whitefly, and white bug. About 1 mm in length, this pest lives in herds, sucking the sap of various plants. In addition to coconut, the insect attacks plants such as bitter gourd, watermelon, snake gourd, belonging to the Cucurbitaceae and peanut, cowpea, and beans, belonging to the Leguminosae, also being affected. In addition, it acts as a carrier of viruses or fungi and causes huge damage. At higher temperatures, their activity is somewhat stronger.

This white-colored insect penetrates the leaflets of coconut seedlings and mature coconut trees and then damages the coconut plant by sucking the sap out of them. They belong to the phylum Arthropoda class and have four basic stages in the life cycle. On the underside of the leaves of the coconut tree, many stages of the life cycle of this insect can be seen with the naked eye.

Figure 2 - white fly (Aleurodicus cocois)

Figure 2 – white fly (𝘈𝘭𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘪𝘴)

Control of white fly damage
There are two methods recommended by the CRI to control the coconut white fly attack.

The first method is the physical method. In this method, manual removal has to be done. Application of pressurized water to wash away the underside of the leaves well also removes the white flies.

Because these white flies are drawn to yellow, using yellow polythene with grease applied is another strategy for population control.

The second method is the chemical method, and in this method, the application of recommended chemicals can be done. For instance, the application of a dissolved solution of 3g of Thiamethoxam or 20ml of carbosulfan or 2.5 g of an insecticide containing chlorantraniliprole in 10 liters of water, using a sprayer, thoroughly wets the underside of the leaves of the plant.

Sustainable Use of Biopesticides and Biofertilizers in Agriculture

Biotechnology is the technology that utilizes biological systems, living organisms or parts of these to develop or create different products. The application of microbes in sustainable agriculture and the environment is a rapidly growing segment in the novel world. Increasing food demand poses a great challenge to the traditional agriculture system. While the development of biotechnology applications began in 6000 BC., the development of genetic tools and cellular engineering was initiated in 1970. Genetically modified (GM) crops that are resistant to many pathogens and weeds have contributed to the increase of high yields in agriculture.

Biofertilizers are the preparation of live or latent cells of efficient strains of microorganisms used for application to accelerate the process of plant growth and development. They can add 20-200 Kg N/ha per year under optimum soil conditions and thereby increase the total crop yield by 15-25%. Rhizobium BGA, Azotobacter sp., Gluconacetobacter spp. stimulate the production of growth-promoting substances like Vitamin-B complex, Indole acetic acid (IAA) and Gibberellic acid. Phosphate solubilizing/mobilizing biofertilizers solubilize/mobilize about 30-50Kg P2O5/ha. Azotobacter inoculants applied to non-legume plants promote seed germination and the initial vigor of plants. Phosphate ions (PO43-) mobilize the Mycorrhiza (VAM fungi) and enhance the uptake of P, Zn, S & water leading to uniform crop growth & enhancing resistance to disease & hardiness of transplant stock. They act as antagonists and suppress the incidence of soil-borne pathogens thus helping in the control of diseases. Biofertilizers improve the physical properties, tilth, productivity and health of the soil. Nostoc, Anabaena and Scytonema have reclaimed the alkaline soils. Cellulolytic and ligninolytic microorganisms enhance the degradation/decomposition of organic matter in the soil.

Biopesticides are microbes possessing invasive genes that can attack the defense genes of weeds by killing them. Endospores of the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are used as an organic pesticide because some strains produce crystals in the endospores that are toxic to insects when they consume endospores. Controversial crop plants are genetically modified with the Bt toxins genes to develop resistance to pests. Bioherbicides can persist for a long time in the environment which can exist for the upcoming growing season and affect target pathogens only. Seed coated with inoculants can be developed to protect the plants during their critical seedling stage.

Bioinsecticides are naturally-occurring substances from different sources that control insect pests. They are low toxicity to non-target microorganisms, easily degradable, highly effective in small quantities and effect on target pests only. The bioinsecticides contain microbes such as Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae or brunneum and Isaria fumosorosea contact with pests, affect the nervous and muscular system, paralyzing and eventually killing the insects and mites.

Bioremediation is the process that makes use of microorganisms to eliminate pollutants from soil. Microorganisms can sequestrate toxic metals by cell wall components, alternating biochemical pathways to block metal uptake, converting metals into innocuous forms by enzymes, enhancing the mobility by siderophores and reducing the availability of heavy metals. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans convert sulphate to hydrogen sulphate that reacts with heavy metals to convert an insoluble form of metal sulphides. The genetically modified strain of P. fluroscences HK 44 is able to sense pollution, signaling through bioluminescence.

Figure 1 - Role of biofertilizers and biopesticides in organic farming

Figure 1 – Role of biofertilizers and biopesticides in organic farming

References

Binte Mostafiz, S., Rahman, M., Binte, S., Rahman, M. and Rahman, M. (2012). Biotechnology: Role of Microbes in Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Health Quantification and analysis of Somatic embryogenesis receptor like kinase gene expression on Malaysian Indica rice View project Low carbon pathways_GUP_UTM JB View project The Internet Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology: Role of Microbes in Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Health. Agriculture And Environmental Health. The Internet Journal of Microbiology, [online] 10(1). doi:10.5580/2b91.

Dhir, B. (2017). Biofertilizers and Biopesticides: Eco-friendly Biological Agents. Advances in Environmental Biotechnology, pp.167–188. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4041-2_10.

Berg, G. (2009). Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 84(1), pp.11–18. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7.

Image courtesy

Featured image – https://www.peptechbio.com/blog-biofertilizers/
Figure 1 – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128223581000092

Nano-technology in Micro-biology

Nano microbiology, which is a rapidly evolving field of research, exists at the crossroads of biology and nanoscience. Nanotechnology is a state-of-the-art technique of using particles between 1 to 100 nm, which originated as both organic and inorganic forms. Nevertheless, the size and shape depends on the method and the materials used in the fabrication process. The particle size is important because the physicochemical stability and biological activity of the particles depend on the size.

Various physical and chemical methods are broadly used for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Though these approaches offer higher production rate and better size control over the synthesized nanoparticles, they are considered unfavorable due to high capital cost, energy requirements, anaerobic conditions, use of toxic reagents and the generation of hazardous wastes. These downsides obscure the down streaming processes, raise production cost and cause apprehensions about the environment. Moreover, the chemically synthesized nanoparticles are less biocompatible and use of toxic chemicals for synthesis and lack of stability has limited their use in clinical applications. Therefore, development of environmentally safe, economical, and biocompatible procedures for synthesis of nanoparticles are desired. Synthesis of nanoparticles by biological means offers cheap, nontoxic and eco-friendly alternatives to their counter physical and chemical methods. Microbes are found to be tiny nano-factories and microbial synthesis of nanoparticles has merged biotechnology, microbiology and nanotechnology into a new field of nano-biotechnology. Metal–microbe interactions have been widely used for bioremediation and bioleaching biomineralization, but nano-biotechnology is still at its infancy. Owing to its potent benefits it may have promising applications in nano-medicine.

For biological synthesis of nanoparticles, microbes have been exploited all over the globe. Microbes like bacteria, fungi and yeasts are mostly preferred for nanoparticle (NPs) synthesis because of their fast growth rate, easy cultivation and their ability to grow at ambient conditions of temperature, pH and pressure. Owing to their adaptability to metal toxic environments, microorganisms possess intrinsic potential to synthesize nanoparticles of inorganic materials by following reduction mechanisms via intracellular and extracellular routes. Microbes trap metal ions from the environment and turn those metal ions into the elemental form using their enzymatic activities.

Figure 1 - Microbial synthesis and applications of nanoparticles

Figure 1 – Microbial synthesis and applications of nanoparticles

Bacteria can remarkably reduce heavy metal ions to produce nanoparticles. Researchers have demonstrated bacteria mediated interactive pathways responsible for metal ion reduction and their ability to precipitate metals on nanoscale. A major advantage of bacteria-based nanoparticle synthesis is their large scale sustainable production with minimal use of toxic chemicals, however there are certain limitations like laborious bacterial culturing processes, less control over their size, shape and distribution. Fungi also possess various intracellular and extracellular enzymes capable of producing mono-dispersed nanoparticles. Yield of nanoparticles is high in fungi as compared to bacteria due to relatively larger biomass. Various fungal species like Verticillium luteoalbum, Colletotrichum sp., Fusarium oxysporum, Trichothecium sp., Aspergillus oryzae, Alternaria alternata, Trichoderma viride etc., have been reported to produce nanoparticles with diverse shapes and sizes, which can be used in a vast range of applications.

References

Adegbeye, M. J., Elghandour, M. M. M. Y., Barbabosa-Pliego, A., Monroy, J. C., Mellado, M., Ravi Kanth Reddy, P., & Salem, A. Z. M. (2019). Nanoparticles in Equine Nutrition: Mechanism of Action and Application as Feed Additives. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 78, 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2019.04.001

Fariq, A., Khan, T., Yasmin, A. (2017). Microbial synthesis of nanoparticles and their potential applications in biomedicine. Journal of Applied Biomedicine. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jab.2017.03.004

Joye, I. J., Davidov-Pardo, G., & McClements, D. J. (2014). Nanotechnology for increased micronutrient bioavailability. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 40(2), 168–182. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.08.006

Rai, H.K. and Rai, P., 2018. Solar Energy Harvesting Using Nanotechnology. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(6), pp.348-353.

Image courtesy

Featured image – https://www.upol.cz/fileadmin/_processed_/8/a/csm_csm_bakterie_Zurnal_338f5257d5_d97f46f8c8.png
Figure 1 – https://www.cell.com/cms/attachment/2060273999/2062570764/gr1.jpg

Mushroom Cultivation in Sri Lanka

What are mushrooms?
Mushrooms are unique structures of fungi that belong to the Kingdom fungi, which also includes yeasts, moulds, and mildews. Fungi have been categorized under four major groups.

1. Zygomycota
2. Ascomycota
3. Basidiomycota
4. Deuteromycota

Most mushrooms belong to the Basidiomycota ,and aid in producing, storing of spores that would be used in reproduction. Mushrooms have been consumed by humans for thousands of years. Since the demand for these mushrooms has increased, commercial mushroom cultivation has started. In Sri Lanka, demand for edible mushrooms has increased in the last few years.
In Sri Lanka, growing mushrooms is primarily done at the household level as a small business. There are many mushroom growers in Sri Lanka. Even though there is a sizable market for high-quality mushrooms, most growers frequently fall short of the standards because they lack the necessary knowledge. If done properly, mushroom cultivation can be a lucrative business.

Figure 1 - Labelled figure of mushrooms

Figure 1 – Labelled figure of mushrooms

Commercially Cultivated Mushrooms in Sri Lanka

  • Piduru Bimmal (Volvariella volvacea)
  • Muthubeli Bimmal (Pleurotus ostreatus)
  • Boththam Bimmal (Agaricus bisporus)
  • Shitake Bimmal (Lentinus edodes)
  • Abaloni Bimmal (Pleurotus cystidiosus)

Among these mushroom types, Muthubeli Bimmal is the most popular Mushroom variety and Piduru Bimmal are commonly cultivated.

Edible Mushrooms Native to Sri Lanka
Uru Paha Bimmal – Lentinus giganteus
Uru paha Bimmal is a mushroom species native to Sri Lanka. This mushroom species has the taste of Pork. Hence the name Uru (Pig) paha Bimmal. This species is the largest Mushroom in Sri Lanka. Uru paha bimmal grow naturally around the roots of large trees like Jack (Artocarpus heterophyllus). This species has shown promising results of growing under artificial environments. Apart from these varieties, some other types of mushrooms that naturally grow in Sri Lanka include Mawali Hathu, Indalolu, Monara Bimmal, and Kiri Bimmal.

Pest and the Disease Management in Mushroom Cultivation
Large-scale financial losses result from pest attacks on the mushroom industry. Particularly harmful insect species include Drosophila, which feeds on these mushrooms. When mushrooms appear transparent or decayed, these pest attacks are apparent.

Control Methods
Once these mushrooms have been infected, it is difficult to control the pests of mushrooms. So, it is really important to take actions to prevent the pest attacks from the beginning of the cultivation. Keeping the equipment used in Mushroom cultivation clean, avoid using same cultivation room to keep differently aged mushrooms, removing and destroying any infected bags from the cultivating area ,harvesting the mushrooms at correct maturity, only using sprayers to moist the cropping room without using hands, if the pest attack is severe, remove all the bags from the cottage and use a recommended insecticide to treat the infected area – keeping the cottage close for 24 hours after treating could be practiced.

Preservation of Harvested Mushrooms
As mushrooms contain more than 90% of water, they have less shelf – life. If mushrooms are kept in an open environment, these mushrooms can dry rapidly due to loss of water. This will also result in reduction of weight of mushrooms. So, it is really important to preserve these mushrooms immediately after harvesting.
Muthubeli Bimmal can be kept fresh in a cold place up to 12 hours after the harvest. This can be kept inside a refrigerator, packed in aerated polythene bags up to 2 – 3 days. To keep this species up to 4 -6 weeks, mushrooms can be boiled for three minutes and stored in a deep freezer.
Stripped mushrooms can be boiled with water vapor for 03 minutes and then sun dried to preserve for 06 months.
Piduru Bimmal is less preservable. It can be kept up to several hours after the harvest in a cold environment. Can be kept up to 24 hours in a refrigerator.

Characteristics of Poisonous Mushrooms
Poisonous mushrooms have a dark color and a strong aroma. One of the characteristics of poisonous mushrooms is that they deter insects.

Simple Tricks to Identify the Poisonous Mushrooms at Home
To identify poisonous mushrooms, one can perform easy tests at home. The mushrooms may be poisonous if the onions turn purple when cooked with them or if they stain the silver spoons black.

Figure 2 – Amanita muscaria – a Poisonous Mushroom

Figure 2 – 𝘈𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢 – a Poisonous Mushroom

Advantages of Mushroom Cultivation
Good return on investment, availability of low-cost raw material, ability to start the cultivation within a small space, ability to start the cultivation with prevailing infrastructure facilities (Room inside a house), harvesting is possible in short duration of time.

Probiotics – Double Edged Sword Effect of a Known Savior

Probiotics are the live beneficial microbes that obtain for desired outcomes, such as prevention of diseased state or improvement in general health outcome observed in host organisms. Probiotics can be either bacteria or fungi. Most probiotic organisms are lactic acid bacteria (LAB), which comprise a wide range of genera and include a considerable number of species, especially Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus species. Probiotic bacteria can be epiphytes, endophytes, or rhizospheric bacteria. There are plant probiotics as well as human or animal probiotics, where animal probiotics are the majority.

Nowadays, there is a trend of using probiotics instead of antibiotics due to their higher safety. But there are certain probiotics that contain antibiotic-resistant genes. The hidden danger in this trend is that the genes that are responsible for antibiotic resistance can be horizontally transferred to other bacterial strains, especially pathogen genomes. Horizontal gene transfer occurs through three main genetic mechanisms: transformation, conjugation, and transduction. Once transferred, the genes and pathogens continue to evolve, often resulting in bacteria with greater resistance.

There have been several clinical incidents, including treatment failures and eventually extending to both hospital morbidities as well as mortalities, caused by pathogens with antibiotic resistant genes. Lactobacillus is a very good example of a probiotic bacteria genus which consists of antibiotic resistant genes. According to recent studies, most of the Lactobacillus strains contain at least 11 tetracycline resistant genes, which were able to transfer horizontally between Lactobacillus strains as well as to different gram-positive bacteria, including pathogens such as Staphylococcus strains. Apart from that, Lactobacillus strains, which are multi-drug resistant mediated, have a high chance of acquiring antibiotic resistance and receiving antibiotic resistant genes from other bacterial strains. This phenomenon can also happen in probiotic strains which have not been studied yet.

Figure 1 - Mechanisms of bacterial horizontal gene transfer

Figure 1 – Mechanisms of bacterial horizontal gene transfer

There is no mechanism to eliminate the antibiotic resistance effect of probiotics. But these genes can be screened according to a properly recognized procedure to reduce the effect of antibiotic resistance. This is a crucial safety hurdle that a certain probiotic should pass before being used as a safe probiotic. Educating the public about this double-edged sword effect is a current need for the betterment of the community.

References
Shuhadha, M. F. F., Panagoda, G. J., Madhujith, T., & Jayawardana, N. W. I. A. (2017). Evaluation of probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus sp. isolated from cow and buffalo curd samples collected from Kandy. Ceylon Medical Journal, 62(3).

Ruiza, D., Agaras, B., de Werrab, P., Wall, L. G., & Valverde, C. (2011). Characterization and screening of plant probiotic traits of bacteria isolated from rice seeds cultivated in Argentina. The Journal of Microbiology, 49(6), 902-912.

Burmeister, A. R. (2015). Horizontal gene transfer. Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2015(1), 193.

Gueimonde, M., Sánchez, B., de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G., & Margolles, A. (2013). Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria. Frontiers in microbiology, 4, 202.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://theconversation.com/how-to-train-the-bodys-own-cells-to-combat-antibiotic-resistance-106052
Figure 1 – https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361748873/figure/fig4/AS:1184084101472259@1659319057983/Mechanisms-of-horizontal-gene-transfer-where-bacterial-DNA-can-be-transferred-from-one_W640.jpghttps://www.curioustem.org/stem-articles/horizontal-gene-transfer

Role of Biofertilizers in Agriculture

Global food production has increased by many folds as compared to the past, but still, the pace of agricultural productivity is not adequate for a rapidly increasing population. Presently, chemical fertilizers used for crop yield improvements are not compatible because of their environmental hazards and cost. Indiscriminate use of synthetic fertilizers has led to pollution and contamination of soil and water basins. This has resulted in the soil being deprived of essential plant nutrients and organic matter. It has led to the depletion of beneficial microorganisms and insects, indirectly reducing soil fertility and making crops more prone to diseases. The increasing cost of fertilizers would be unaffordable to small and marginal farmers, thus intensifying the depleting levels of soil fertility due to the widening gap between nutrient removal and supplies. In the present scenario, there has been a real resurgence of environmental-friendly, sustainable agricultural products. Biofertilizers are formulations that contain living microorganisms that have the ability to colonize crop roots and promote growth by improving nutrient availability and acquisition.

Classification of Biofertilizers
Several microorganisms and their interactions with crop plants are being used to create biofertilizers. They can be grouped in different ways based on their nature and function.

Rhizobium: Rhizobium is a soil habitat bacterium, which colonizes legume roots and fixes atmospheric nitrogen symbiotically. Morphology and physiology differ from free-living conditions to nodule bacteroids. They are the most efficient biofertilizers as per the quantity of nitrogen fixed. They have seven genera and are highly specific for forming nodules in legumes, referred to as cross inoculation.

Azotobacter: Among various Azotobacter species, A. chroococcum happens to be the dominant inhabitant in arable soils capable of fixing N2 (2-15 mg N2 fixed /g of carbon source) in culture media. The bacterium produces abundant slime, which helps in soil aggregation. The numbers of A. chroococcum in Indian soils rarely exceeds 105/g soil due to a lack of organic matter and the presence of antagonistic microorganisms in soil.

Azospirillum: Azospirillum lipoferum and A. brasilense are primary inhabitants of the soil, the rhizosphere, and intercellular spaces of the root cortex of graminaceous plants. They develop associative symbiotic relationships with graminaceous plants. Apart from nitrogen fixation, growth promoting substance production (IAA), disease resistance, and drought tolerance are some of the additional benefits of inoculation with Azospirillum.

Cyanobacteria: Both free-living as well as symbiotic cyanobacteria (blue green algae) have been harnessed in rice cultivation.

Azolla is a free-floating water fern that floats in water and fixes atmospheric nitrogen in association with the nitrogen-fixing blue green alga Anabaena azollae. Azolla can be used either as an alternate nitrogen source or as a supplement to commercial nitrogen fertilizers. Azolla is used as a biofertilizer for wetland rice and it is known to contribute 40–60 kg N/ha per rice crop.

Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM): Several soil bacteria and fungi, notably species of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Penicillium, Aspergillus, etc., secrete organic acids and lower the pH in their vicinity to bring about the dissolution of bound phosphates in soil. Increased yields of wheat and potatoes were demonstrated due to inoculation of peat-based cultures of Bacillus polymyxa and Pseudomonas striata.

AM fungi: The transfer of nutrients, mainly phosphorus, and also zinc and sulphur from the soil milleu to the cells of the root cortex is mediated by intracellular obligate fungal endosymbionts of the genera Glomus, Gigaspora, Acaulospora, Sclerocysts, and Endogone, which possess vesicles for storage of nutrients and arbuscules for funneling these nutrients into the root system. By far, the commonest genus appears to be Glomus, which has several species distributed throughout the soil.

Silicate solubilizing bacteria (SSB): Microorganisms are capable of degrading silicates and aluminum silicates. Several organic acids are produced during the metabolism of microbes, and these have a dual role in silicate weathering. They supply H+ ions to the medium and promote hydrolysis. Also, they promote the removal of and retention of organic acids like citric, oxalic acid, keto acids, and hydroxy carbolic acids, in the medium in a dissolved state.

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): The group of bacteria that colonize roots or rhizosphere soil and are beneficial to crops is referred to as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). The PGPR inoculants promote growth through suppression of plant disease (termed Bioprotectants), improved nutrient acquisition (termed Biofertilizers), or phytohormone production (termed Biostimulants). Species of Pseudomonas and Bacillus can produce as yet not well characterized phytohormones or growth regulators that cause crops to have greater numbers of fine roots, which have the effect of increasing the absorptive surface of plant roots for uptake of water and nutrients. These PGPR are referred to as Biostimulants, and the phytohormones they produce include indole-acetic acid, cytokinins, gibberellins, and inhibitors of ethylene production.

The formulation of biofertilizers is a crucial multistep process that includes the mixing of a suitable carrier with an inoculant, providing optimal conditions during storage, packaging, and dispatch, and ensuring survival and establishment after introduction into soil.

Methods of Application of Biofertilizers
Seed Treatment: 200 g of biofertilizer is suspended in 300-400 mL of water and mixed gently with 10 kg of seeds using an adhesive like gum acacia, jiggery solution, etc. The seeds are then spread on a clean sheet or cloth under shade to dry and can be used immediately for sowing.

Seedling Root Dip: This method is used for transplanted crops. For rice crops, a bed is made in the field and filled with water. Recommended fertilizers are mixed in this water and the roots of seedlings are dipped for 8–10 h and transplanted.

Soil Treatment: 4 kg each of the recommended biofertilizers is mixed in 200 kg of compost and kept overnight. This mixture is incorporated in the soil at the time of sowing or planting.

Advantages of Using Biofertilizers
Some of the advantages associated with biofertilizers include:

  • They are eco-friendly as well as cost-effective.
  • Their use leads to soil enrichment, and the quality of the soil improves with time.
  • Though they do not show immediate results, the results shown over time are spectacular.
  • These fertilizers harness atmospheric nitrogen and make it directly available to the plants.
  • They increase the phosphorus content of the soil by solubilizing and releasing unavailable phosphorus.
  • Biofertilizers improve root proliferation due to the release of growth-promoting hormones.
  • Microorganisms convert complex nutrients into simple nutrients for the availability of the plants.
  • Biofertilizer contains microorganisms which promote the adequate supply of nutrients to the host plants and ensure their proper development of growth and regulation in their physiology.
  • They help in increasing the crop yield by 10–25%.
  • Biofertilizers can also protect plants from soil-borne diseases to a certain degree.

Figure 1 - Mechanisms of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria

Figure 1 – Mechanisms of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria

Constraints in Biofertilizer Technology
Despite the fact that biofertilizer technology is a low-cost, environmentally friendly technology, several constraints limit its application or implementation. The constraints may be:

  • Technological constraints like the unavailability of good quality carrier material and a lack of qualified technical personnel in production units.
  • Infrastructural constraints like lack of essential equipment, power supply, etc.
  • Financial constraints like non-availability of sufficient funds and problems in getting bank loans.
  • Environmental constraints like seasonal demand for biofertilizers, simultaneous cropping operations, and a short span of sowing/planting in a particular locality, etc.
  • Human resource and quality constraints, such as a lack of technically qualified personnel in production units and a lack of appropriate production technique training,
  • Unawareness of the benefits of the technology due to problems in adoption of the technology by the farmers due to different methods of inoculation, no visual difference in the crop growth immediately as that of inorganic fertilizers.

Application of biological fertilizers is thought to be a key element in maintaining soil fertility and crop productivity at a sufficiently high level, which is indispensable to achieve the sustainability of farming. Biofertilizers may also help mitigate pitfalls arising from the growing demand of the global population for food and from the widespread chemicalization of agroecosystems. The changing approach to agricultural practices makes biofertilizers a vital part of modern-day crop production and emphasizes the significance of biological inoculants in forthcoming years.

References
DebmalyaDasguptaa,KulbhushanKumarbRashi,MiglanibRojita,MishracAmrita Kumari,PandadSatpal SinghBishtb.(2021). Microbial biofertilizers: Recent trends and future outlook:Toward the establishment of Microbial biofertilizers: Recent trends and future outlook.

S. Kannaiyan, Cyanobacterial biofertilizer technology for rice crops. In: Algal biotechnology (Trivedi, P.C. Ed.). Pointer publishers, Jaipur, India.2001. Rakesh Kumar, Narendra Kumawat,Yogesh Kumar Sahu.(2017). Role of Biofertilizers in Agriculture.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://Anuvia aims to have its biofertilizer on 20m farm acres by 2025 (agfundernews.com)
Figure 1 – https://www.aimpress.com/article/id/371

What’s Next for Sri Lanka’s Agriculture Sector?

Majority of the Sri Lankan families, including yours and mine, are facing an unprecedented food crisis. With the country’s acute malnutrition among children under 5 years, reaching 17%, Sri Lanka has secured the second highest malnutrition rate across South Asia, a position of shame and disappointment.

Many factors, including the Covid-19 pandemic, national issues such as poor governance and irrational policy making can be identified as major catalysts which have escalated this nutritional crisis.

Significant effects have been raised due to the continuous rising of food costs, which was reported as a 90.9 percent increase in July 2022 (Department of Census and Statistics – Sri Lanka). While a higher level of inflation is expected in the future, why has Sri Lanka’s inflation been so high and identification of the influence of the agricultural sector is of utmost importance.

In a broader perspective, Sri Lanka’s foreign currency shortage and bad credit reputation has resulted in continuous failures of purchasing and importing key agricultural imports such as fuel, fertilizer and pesticides. This in turn has led to almost halving of the gross agricultural production (BBC.com). While blames are being shared and thrown across, an important realization noted through this crisis was the heavy reliance on imports and unsustainable nature of Sri Lanka’s agricultural sector.

Although historically known to have produced enough rice to ship excess to Myanmar, today Sri Lanka is a recipient of rice donations from the same nation. There’s much to reflect and lament on where and what went wrong and even now it is not too late to take mitigatory actions.

Donations from friendly nations: Myanmar, China and India as well as global organizations such as the UN’s World Food Program play a vital role. Nevertheless, questions on their proper management and equivalent distribution exists in a major scale.

For short-term and long-term solutions, an in-depth analysis of the current and prevalent issues must be carried out and a systematic action plan must be implemented. This should be done while integrating the expert knowledge and advice of academics and researchers across Sri Lanka – frequently disregarded by all-knowing political factions.

Agriculture is of global importance and therefore, almost every day, a novel discovery inching us closer towards global food security, is being released. However, these require considerable investments and specialized training which is a heavy price to pay for a country already in crisis.

Therefore, search for feasible solutions that can be employed in a localized and short-term framework is of paramount importance.

1. Promoting urban farming. Farming in Sri Lanka has been concentrated in certain regions away from urbanization. Although it makes sense for large scale operations, small or medium scale farming within urban regions should be encouraged including individual households.

2. Improving existing infrastructure to facilitate easy transportation, distribution of agricultural products from farmer to consumer and minimizing mediator costs.

3. Reducing food wastage. Despite the ongoing crisis, food wastage by individuals and corporations is a significant problem. Focusing on demand vs. supply, and donation of excess daily produce can help feed many.

4. Providing specialized, ground-level support and guidance to farmers with available newest technologies and local discoveries.

5. Recruiting the private sector for aid, under the corporate social responsibility frameworks.

6. Raising public awareness of the ongoing crisis and creating a collective social impact via Scientific communication.

Although feasible solutions are available, without proper guidance or monitoring, it is difficult to achieve them. A national strategy with a clear set of objectives and goals is imperative if we are to overcome this crisis because, nutritional Crisis might not be your problem today, but it could be yours tomorrow.

Use of Biofertilizer in Modern Agriculture

Modernized agricultural methods play a significant role in meeting the food demands of a growing world population, which has also led to an increasing dependence on chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The term “chemical fertilizer” refers to any number of synthetic compound substances created specifically to increase crop yield and composed of known quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, and their exploitation causes air and groundwater pollution by eutrophication of water bodies. Because of this, recent attention has been given to developing an environmentally friendly bio fertilizer.

The new trend in agricultural production is the use of biological-based organic fertilizers as an alternative to agro-chemicals. This means that soil fertilization relies on organic inputs to improve nutrient supply and conserve field management. Organic farming is one such strategy that not only ensures food safety but also adds to the biodiversity of the soil. The additional advantages of bio fertilizers include longer shelf life, causing no adverse effects to the ecosystem. Bio fertilizer is made up of free living bacteria that promote plant growth, increase productivity through root strengthening, and help to reduce the amount of synthetic fertilizer used on crops.

Organic farming is mostly dependent on the natural microflora of the soil, which constitutes all kinds of useful bacteria and fungi, including the arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Through nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization or mineralization, the release of plant growth regulating substances, the production of antibiotics, and the biodegradation of organic matter in the soil, biofertilizers keep the soil environment rich in all types of micro- and macronutrients.

When bio fertilizers are applied as a coating for seeds or directly as soil inoculants, the microbes present multiply and participate in nutrient cycling, boosting crop productivity.

In general, 60% to 90% of the total applied fertilizer is lost, and the remaining 10% to 40% is taken up by plants in the traditional use of chemical fertilizer. In this regard, microbial inoculants have paramount significance in integrated nutrient management systems to sustain agricultural productivity and a healthy environment. The PGPR or co-inoculants of PGPR and AMF can increase the nutrient use efficiency of fertilizers.

The rhizosphere, which is the narrow zone of soil surrounding plant roots, can comprise up to 1011 microbial cells per gram of root and over 30,000 prokaryotic species. There are microbial strains providing numerous services to crop plants, like organic matter decomposition, nutrient acquisition, water absorption, nutrient recycling, weed control, and bio-control. Rhizosphere microbial communities are an alternative to chemical fertilizers and have become a subject of great interest in sustainable agriculture and bio-safety programs.

A major focus in the coming decades will be on safe and environmentally friendly methods of sustainable crop production by utilizing beneficial microorganisms.Such microorganisms, in general, consist of diverse naturally occurring microbes whose inoculation into the soil ecosystem advances soil physicochemical properties, soil microbe biodiversity, soil health, plant growth and development, and crop productivity. The agriculturally useful microbial populations include plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, N2-fixing cyanobacteria, mycorrhiza, plant disease suppressive beneficial bacteria, stress tolerance endophytes, and bio-degrading microbes.

These biofertilizers are a supplementary component to soil and crop management traditions. Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Rhizobium, cyanobacteria, phosphorus and potassium solubilising microorganisms, and mycorrhizae are some of the PGPRs that were found to increase in the soil under no tillage or minimum tillage treatment. Efficient strains of Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Phosphobacter, and Rhizobacter can provide a significant amount of nitrogen to plants and increase the plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, percentage of seed filling, and seed dry weight. Similarly, in rice, the addition of Azotobacter, Azospirillum, and Rhizobium promotes the physiology and improves the root morphology.

References
Abbaszadeh-Dahaji, P., Masalehi, F., and Akhgar, A. (2020). Improved growth and nutrition of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) plants in a low-fertility calcareous soil treated with plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria and Fe-EDTA. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.

Agnolucci, M., Avio, L., Pepe, A., Turrini, A., Cristani, C., Bonini, P., et al. (2019). Bacteria associated with a commercial mycorrhizal inoculum: community composition and multifunctional activity as assessed by illumina sequencing and culture-dependent tools.

Ahmed, B., Midrarullah, and Sajjad Mirza, M. (2013). Effects of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on different growth parameters of cold area rice variety, Fakre malakand. Afr. J. Microbiol.

Ahmed, E., and Holmström, S. J. M. (2014). Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications. Microb. Biotechnol.

Alori, E. T., Glick, B. R., and Babalola, O. O. (2017). Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://biomassmagazine.com/articles/19167/unlocking-biofertilizer-as-additional-revenue-source

The Secret of Poinsettia with Phytoplasma

Poinsettia is a colorful blooming potted plant, in the Euphorbia family. It is a popular holiday plant especially used for decorations during the winter holidays in Europe and American countries. Poinsettia is more attractive because of its colorful bracts (leaves). Different colored poinsettias in the market are from different varieties. The Poinsettia flower is made up of bracts that look like a petal, but in the center, there are tiny yellow flowers called cyathia. The potted poinsettia has more branches and it grows like a small bush and it is an important feature in the market. They are usually produced through cutting propagation of the axial bud or terminal bud of vegetative stock plants. It is necessary to treat the plant with chemicals 6-7 times. Today all the commercial poinsettia varieties are planted with free branching phenotypes. The secret of this free branching is a result of the infection by phytopathogens known as Phytoplasma.

Phytoplasmas are a group of prokaryotes which are very small bacteria without a cell wall but covered by a membranous envelope. Phytopathogenic studies of various genes of phytoplasma suggest that they are descended from walled-bacteria in the Bacillus/Clostridium group. They are less than 1µm in diameter with a reduced genome greatly in size. Therefore, they lack enzymes needed for biosynthetic pathways. Thus, what should they do to obtain the necessary compounds? All known phytoplasmas infect plants and transmit through insect vectors and obtain necessary compounds from plants and vectors. Phytoplasmas are phloem-limited pathogens. In plants phytoplasma mainly lives in the sieve cells of phloem tissues. Therefore, phytoplasma transmission has been confirmed only through phloem-feeding insects. Phloem-feeding insects such as leafhoppers and planthoppers of the order Hemiptera are identified as vectors. Vectors acquire phytoplasmas passively during feeding and have a long time period of acquisition during feeding time to acquire sufficient phytoplasmas to establish in the vector body. It can take up to nearly three weeks. Once phytoplasmas are established, they will be found in most organs of the infected vector. Phytoplasma replicates in the salivary glands of vector insects. In addition, phytoplasma can be transmitted through vegetative propagation.

Phytoplasma diseases spread mainly in tropical and sub-tropical countries. The presence of phytoplasma is associated with a wide range of symptoms. Phyllody is the development of leaf-like growth in place of normal flowers. Some plants develop green color in place of normal flower color (green flowers) called virescence and witches' broom is an abnormal excessive proliferation of axillary shoots resulting in a broom-like growth. The other characteristic symptom is little leaves, the development of abnormally small leaves.

The proliferation of axillary shoots is useful in the production of poinsettia. Witches' broom symptoms are shown at the infection of poinsettia. The phytoplasma associated with poinsettia branching belonging to group 16SrIII-H produces more auxiliary shoots that have more than one coloured shoot with flowers. Therefore, some symptoms of phytoplasma are commercially important except for their negative impacts.

References
Pondrella, M.; Caprara, L.; Bellardi, M.G.; Bertaccini, A., Roll of Different Phytoplasma in Inducing Poinsettia Branching. Proc.10th IS Virus Disease Ornamentals, 2002, pp 170-176.

Assunta, B., Plants and Phytoplasma: When bacteria modify Plants. MDPI 2022, 11
Hogenhout, S.A., Plant Pathogen – Minor (Phytoplasma). Elsevier 2009

Kumari, S.; Nagendran, K.; Bahadur Rai, A.; Singh, B.; Rao, G.P.; Bertaccini, A., Global Status of Phytoplasma Disease in Vegetable crop. Frontiers in Microbiology 2019, 10

Bertaccini, A.; Oshima, K.; Maejima, K.’; Namba, S., Phytoplasma: Plant Pathogenic Bacteria-III, Chapter 2

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://www.ambius.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Poinsettia-1024×679.jpg

Microbial Biopesticides

Introduction to biopesticides
Biopesticides are biological agents used to control pest populations.They include botanicals, pathogenic microbes such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, other natural enemies of pests such as parasitoids, predators, nematodes and semiochemicals.

Biopesticides can be divided into three major categories.

1. Microbial pesticides
These consist of microorganisms as the active ingredient. Microbial pesticides can control many kinds of pests. However, the active ingredient of the biopesticide is relatively specific for its target pest.
E.g., Bacillus thuringiensis: each strain of this bacterium produces a different mix of proteins that specifically kills one or few related species of insect larvae.

2. Biochemical Pesticides
These are naturally occurring substances that control pests by non–toxic mechanisms in contrast to conventional pesticides that either kill or inactivate pests.
E.g., Sex pheromones, various scented plant extracts that interfere with the mating behavior of pests.

3. Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs)
This is where plants produce certain pesticidal constituents by themselves from genetic material that are inserted to the plant genome.
E.g., Scientists can extract the gene for the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt.) pesticidal protein and introduce the gene into the plant genome. Thereby, the plant can manufacture the particular pesticidal protein that inhibit the pest when it feeds on the plant.

An insight to microbial biopesticides
In this category, the active ingredient is a microorganism that either occurs naturally or is genetically engineered.

The pesticide action may be from the organism itself or from a substance it produces. The most commonly used microbial biopesticides are the living organisms which are pathogenic for the pest of interest. They include,

(i) Biofungicides (E.g., Trichoderma, Pseudomonas, Bacillus)
(ii) Bioherbicides (E.g., Phytophthora)
(iii) Bioinsecticides (E.g., Bacillus thuringiensis)

The active ingredient of the microbial pesticide (which is a microorganism such as bacterium, fungus, virus, protozoa, alga, rickettsia, mycoplasma or nematode) suppresses pests either by producing toxic metabolites, competition, or various other modes of action.

An example for a microbial biopesticide; Bacterial biopesticides
Bacterial biopesticides are the most common form of microbial pesticides that function in multiple ways. Generally, they are used as insecticides, although they can be used to control the growth of plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi.

As an insecticide, they are generally specific to individual species of moths, butterflies, beetles, flies, and mosquitoes. To be effective, they must come into contact with the target pest and may require to be ingested. In insects, bacteria disrupt the digestive system by producing endotoxins that are often specific to the particular insect pest.

When used to control a pathogenic bacteria or fungus, the bacterial biopesticide colonizes the plant and crowds out the pathogenic species. The most widely used microbial pesticides are subspecies and strains of B. thuringiensis during its sporulation synthesizes crystalline infusions containing proteins known as endotoxins or Cry proteins, which have insecticidal properties.

Due to their high efficiency and safety in the environment, B. Thuringiensis and Cry proteins are considered as sustainable alternatives to chemical pesticides for the control of insects.

References
Ruiu, L. (2018). Microbial Biopesticides in Agroecosystems. Agronomy, 8(11), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8110235

What are Biopesticides? | US EPA. US EPA. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/what-are-biopesticides.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://images.app.goo.gl/6Cg6FVPfKRsEDS41A

Mysterious secrets of Diatoms

Did you know that one out of every five breaths you take each day comes from “Diatoms,” a truly fascinating organism found in nature. These single-celled algae can produce up to twenty percent of the oxygen on the planet. Algae with a single cell make up the biggest category of creatures on Earth, the diatoms. Diatoms are thought to have up to 2 million different species, and more are being found every year, according to scientists.

Figure 1 - Different shapes of diatoms

Figure 1 – Different shapes of diatoms

The diatom, one of nature's silicon marvels, has recently amazed the scientific community with its exquisite patterns and long-lasting resilience. Most diatoms can live alone or in colonies that resemble zigzags, stars, or long chains.

Do you know diatoms are glass house owners? Wow! Yes, they are. Diatoms practically live in glass houses, comprised of silica or silicon dioxide, the same material that makes up sand and glass, which makes sex, development, and buoyancy challenging for them. The tiny, elaborate diatom shells have a variety of shapes, including crowns, snowflakes, stars, cylinders, chandeliers, and pillboxes.

Figure 2: Microscopic stained glass from diatoms

Figure 2: Microscopic stained glass from diatoms

Diatoms drive the recycling of silica, which makes up a quarter of the earth's crust, by producing enzymes that pull dissolved silica out of water. With this distinguishing feature of diatom anatomy of which they are surrounded by a silica (hydrated silicon dioxide) cell wall known as a frustule, and of their photonic nanostructure, these frustules have structural coloration, while earning them the nicknames “jewels of the sea” and “living opals.”

Figure 3: Electron microscopic view of diatoms

Figure 3: Electron microscopic view of diatoms

Another particularly intriguing feature of diatoms is their ability to transition from saltwater to freshwater and back again. Diatoms have benefited from moving from one habitat to another in terms of diversification. Their silica bio-shells have piqued the interest of nanotechnologists, who are hoping that diatoms may make it easier to customize tiny structures that are beyond the scope of material science. Additionally, because the shape of the frustule varies from species to species, there is a huge diversity in the dimensions of diatoms. This allows for the selection of a specific species of diatom to be tailored to a precise requirement, opening the door to the creation of desired three-dimensional nano composites.

Have you ever heard of Diatomaceous Earth (DE)? Well, even after death, they serve as DE, which is a filtration-capable heterogeneous mixture of fossilized diatom residue. Many diatoms die and sink to the bottom of rivers, lakes, and oceans. Sea floors in some areas can be covered by a layer as deep as 984 feet (300 meters). These layers of dead diatoms fossilize over time and become rich deposits.

Diatoms are easily obtained from the environment, and as they can be transported in small numbers and can grow to a desired confluence from scratch without the use of expensive media or equipment, they are a superb, cost-effective industrial raw resource. Therefore, diatoms are used in numerous scientific fields, including biotechnology, nanotechnology, environmental research, biophysics, and biochemistry, etc.
Diatoms are critical, and almost everything we're learning about them is always brand-new and exciting.
You're probably so fascinated by diatoms that you'd like to meet one by now, right? Diatoms are extremely common protists that live in oceans, lakes, ponds, streams, and damp soil and you don't have to look far to find one. What's that slimy brown scum on submerged sticks and rocks?
Yes! Diatoms!

References
Mishra M, Arukha AP, Bashir T, Yadav D and Prasad GBKS (2017) All New Faces of Diatoms: Potential Source of Nanomaterials and Beyond. Front. Microbiol. 8:1239.

Image courtesy
Featured image – https://medium.com/predict/the-beautiful-microscopic-world-of-diatoms-e64467c698d3
Figure 1 – https://medium.com/predict/the-beautiful-microscopic-world-of-diatoms-e64467c698d3
Figure 2 – https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/making-microscopic-stained-glass-from-algae
Figure 3 – https://www.labroots.com/trending/microbiology/3886/diatoms-they-re-everywhere

Fertility without fertilizer?

Fertilizers are needed to increase the productivity of pastures or meadows. But as humans aren’t ‘statin deficient’ when they have a heart attack, grasslands aren’t ‘fertilizer deficient’ if their performance is poor.
All soils in the world have the potential to grow plants because of the minerals they contain. Minerals come from rocks that are weathered into soluble forms. These minerals are absorbed directly by plants through their roots and are recycled back into soil during the decay process. This is the ‘soluble pool’ that shows up in a soil analysis test. But how do we access the limitless ‘total pool’ available in the crystalline structures of the rock that can provide the full range of the forty-two essential nutrients that plants need to be healthy and disease resistant?

Figure 1: The soil profile in a grassland.

Figure 1: The soil profile in a grassland.

This is where the underground army is required. Every spoonful of healthy soil contains a billion or more microorganisms. In healthy grasslands, there is approximately the same weight in earthworm biomass as the weight of the cattle grazing above ground, not to mention the thousands of other tiny critters all shredding, digesting, dissolving, and excreting to gradually improve the soils.
But to understand this vital process, we should start – as the earth did – with bare rock and some bacteria, fungi, and algae. These microorganisms use enzymes and acids to break down the rock and access the nutrients. With no soil in which to reside, the bacteria, fungi and algae form symbiotic relationships to create a plant-like species called lichens. These communities can then offer a home to mosses and lower ‘successional’ species. Gradually the cycle of growth, death and decay builds enough soil for whole plant communities to thrive.
The more complex the plant community, the better the overall access to the minerals in the soil will be. Different species have different root depths, soil preferences and water tolerance. The plant will grow deep roots if the foliage can develop mature leaf; this will help it access a higher concentration and wider range of the soluble nutrients. Minerals tend to leach downwards as rain passes through the soil layers; deep roots help transport minerals back upwards.
Dead plants, excretions from grazing animals and other organic matter pass some of these recycled minerals in a plant-available form back into the top layers of the soil again. But the real potential to make free fertilizer forever is in the so-called ‘microbial bridge.

Figure 2: The microbial bridge of white mycelia in the rhizosphere of a small pine tree.

Figure 2: The microbial bridge of white mycelia in the rhizosphere of a small pine tree.

References
S. A. Kulasooriya, W. K. Hirimburegama, S. W. Abeysekera, Azolla as a bio fertilizer for rice in Sri Lanka
Matton, D. P., Nass, N., Clarke, A. E., & Newbigin, E. (1994). Self-incompatibility: How plants avoid illegitimate offspring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91(6), 1992–1997. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.6.1992

Image Curtesy
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/06/healthy-soil-microbes-healthy-people/276710/
https://revitalization.org/article/series-of-free-online-videos-teaches-regenerative-agriculture-practitioners-the-science-of-rebuilding-soil-health

Novel findings to enhance sustainable agriculture in the future.

Figure 1: Proposed technical flow for artificial construction of a synthetic microbial community

Throughout the past few decades, the world has changed in a myriad of ways. Although the Green revolution was able to solve many problems that existed such as poverty and hunger, a lot of negative impacts to the environment and humans were caused in massive amounts. In the current world, the biggest problem we face is the growing population and having not enough land for the future living and growing food crops. It is estimated that the human population will nearly be 9.7 billion by the year 2050.
Therefore, search for novel approaches to fulfill human requirements without harming Mother Nature is of utmost importance. One novel trend used by the present scientific world is the use of different connections between microbes and plants for agricultural systems.
Different techniques that are used to enhance the sustainability of agro ecosystems will be discussed in this article.
There are several multi-omics approaches used to reveal the composition of the microbes, microbial networks in which they are present, and their functions.
One such approach is the iTAG sequencing studies which are known as high-throughput sequencing using marker gene tags such as 16s rRNA for bacteria and 18srRNA for fungus. They are used for taxonomical findings via use of nifh, amoA as the functional genes. By using these iTAG sequencing, crop-based research were done for crops such as rice, millet, corn, barley, soybeans, and many more, which proved that there were microorganisms living in those plants.
Since these iTAG-based studies supply limited information, approaches such as shotgun sequencing is more applicable due to the supply of more information about the total DNA content while identifying related genomic features of colonization with plants and their interactions with the microorganism.
Meta-transcriptomics, meta-proteomics, and metabolomics are the other techniques that reveal huge, myriad of important information about the microbiota, including kingdom-level active microbes in the rhizosphere, molecular phenotypes of the rhizosphere microbes, and diagnosis of different plant diseases. These studies lead to the production of biosensors of drought stress by using these microbial communities.
For commercial inventions, bacteria culturing is of paramount importance. Culturomics has come to the stage now, and to enhance that procedure, micro droplet and microfluidics technologies can be used.
Bioinformatics tools have revealed another important microbial network and it is called hub microbes. They play an important role in the plant-microbe interaction and support the network structure.
The above methods give us extremely important information about microorganisms. They assist in designing different techniques to combine those microorganisms to enhance the sustainability of agro ecosystems. As an example, to increase plant performance, host beneficial traits can be assembled with a microbial community and it is known as host-mediated microbiome engineering. Some soil bacteria have the ability to develop resistance against above-ground herbivorous insects for their plants which can also be used as a pest control method. Biocontrol agents and different formulations too are popular approaches across the globe. There should be a clear conscious idea about the microbial potential for enhancing the productivity of the targeted field and the environment.
The above technologies lead to a strong trajectory to enhance the productivity of the crops, fields and ultimately to give rise to a sustainable agro ecosystem.

Reference:
Trivedi, P., Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K. and Leach, J.E. (2021), Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes. New Phytol, 230: 2129-2147. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17319

Plant Viruses: Friend or Foe?

Viruses are non-cellular agents that replicate inside host cells, often leading to disease in the host. Plant virus infections are associated with devastating losses in agriculture and threaten global food security. Viruses are responsible for nearly 50% of plant diseases accounting for an estimated annual economic loss of US$30 billion (Hilaire et al., 2022). Some sources attribute major crop yield losses of up to US$ 60 billion annually worldwide due to plant virus infections (Fingu-Mabola and Francis, 2021). However, not all viruses should be viewed in a negative light. As viruses are host-specific, there is potential to utilize them as bio-control agents against agricultural pests and pathogens. Furthermore, virus infection of plant endophytes has been linked to increased thermal and drought tolerance in plants. This article, therefore, aims to explore the nature of viruses’ pathogenicity in plants and their importance and applications in agriculture.

So what is a virus? A virus is an acellular infectious pathogen composed fundamentally of a ribonucleic acid (RNA) or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) genome encased in a protein coat known as the capsid. In addition, some viruses may have an outer envelope made of a membrane containing lipids and proteins derived from the host cell. Many viruses have spike proteins on the capsid or on the envelope which help the virus bind to receptors on the host cell. The infectious form of a virus is called a virion. Plant viruses, also known as phytoviruses, generally come in the form of helical (roughly elongated) or icosahedral (roughly spherical) shaped capsids (Gergerich and Dolja, 2006). While spherical viruses are relatively small (diameter ~30nm), elongated viruses can be significantly bigger: tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is 300 x 18 nm, and some filamentous viruses can reach the length of ~2000nm (2µm) (Gergerich and Dolja, 2006). A typical plant cell in comparison is ~50µm. Most phytoviruses contain an RNA genome, and DNA phytoviruses are rare (Gergerich and Dolja, 2006).

Why are viruses harmful to the host? Plant viruses are obligate, biotrophic parasites. The virion can penetrate the host cell mainly via wounds caused by damage to the cell wall or through insect vectors. Inside the cell, the viral genome leaves the capsid and takes over the host cell machinery to conduct transcription and translation producing new viral nucleic acids and proteins. New virions are assembled in the plant cell followed by the release of mature virions out of the cell to infect new host cells (Figure 1). In plants, virions can enter neighboring cells via the plasmodesmata (cell-to-cell movement) and can move to other parts of the plant in the phloem tissue (long-distance movement) (Gergerich and Dolja, 2006). The virus infection leads to adverse effects on plants such as stunted growth, abnormal flower and leaf formation, ring patterns and bumps on the foliage, necrotic spots, mosaic, and mottling of the leaves (Figure 2). This can have a severe impact on crop yields.

Figure 1. Simplified life cycles of plant RNA viruses (Carbonell et al, 2018)

Figure 1. Simplified life cycles of plant RNA viruses (Carbonell et al, 2018)

Figure 2. Light green mosaic leaf pattern distinctive in tobacco mosaic virus infection

Figure 2. Light green mosaic leaf pattern distinctive in tobacco mosaic virus infection

As negative an impact as most virus infections may have on plants, the relationship between virus and host can be blurred. Some viruses such as pararetroviruses in tomato plants are integrated in an inactive state within the genome of the host cell for long periods and will only become active under stress; the presence of an inactive virus in the host for an extended time may act as a method of immunization and give the host a selective advantage in fighting against other pathogens (Roossinck, 2015). Meanwhile, some viruses have mutualistic impacts on plants such as counteracting the effects of abiotic stress. In Yellow Stone National Park where geothermal soils can reach temperatures greater than 50˚C, one species of grass that is colonized by a fungal endophyte infected by the virus allows the plant to survive hot temperatures (Roossinck, 2015)! Greenhouse studies have also shown that some virus infected plants have conferred drought-tolerance to plants (Roossinck, 2015). Further study of this phenomena may have useful applications in the development of heat- and drought-tolerant plants that can survive global climate change.
Some plant viruses may also help fight against biotic stress. For instance, studies have shown that white clover mosaic virus infection helps the plant deter fungus gnats and zucchini yellow mosaic virus downregulates the production of volatile compounds in plants that attract beetles; as beetles are vectors of bacterial wilt, the viral infection has protected the plant from wilt disease (Roossinck, 2015). Studies are also being conducted on using bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria) as an agent to control bacteria-borne diseases in plants.

In considering this, it is highly important to thoroughly study phytoviruses to understand the nature of plant-viral relationships and explore applications of this knowledge to increase crop yields.

References
Carbonell, A., García, J.A. et al. (2018). eLS Plant Virus RNA Replication, accessed https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eLS-Plant-Virus-RNA-Replication-Carbonell-Garc%C3%ADa/85f49c32434c48dce5dbe0eec5d7b80e0af810c9
Fingu-Mabola, J.C. and Francis, F. (2021). Aphid-plant-phytovirus pathosystems: influencing factors from vector behaviour to virus spread. Agriculture, 11(6), https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060502.
Gergerich, R.C. and Dolja, V.V. (2006) Introduction to plant viruses, the invisible foe. The Plant Health Instructor, DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2006-0414-01
Hilaire, J., Tindale, S., Jones, G. et al. (2022). Risk perception associated with an emerging agri-food risk in Europe: plant viruses in agriculture. Agriculture and Food Security, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00366-5 .
Roossinck, M. J. (2015) Move over, bacteria! Viruses make their mark as mutualistic microbial symbionts. Journal of Virology, 89(13), pp. 6532-6535.

Image courtesy
Featured image: https://p4.wallpaperbetter.com/wallpaper/374/292/34/medical-virus-wallpaper-preview.jpg
Figure 1: Carbonell, A., García, J.A. et al. (2018). eLS Plant Virus RNA Replication, accessed https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eLS-Plant-Virus-RNA-Replication-Carbonell-Garc%C3%ADa/85f49c32434c48dce5dbe0eec5d7b80e0af810c9

Figure 2 : University of Maryland Extension (2018-2020) https://extension.umd.edu/sites/extension.umd.edu/files/styles/optimized/public/2021-06/HGIC_flowers_peony_virus-symptoms_CC_600.jpg?itok=EEPJsGqA

Significance of biofilms in Agriculture

Microbial biofilms are the colonies of microorganisms on living or biotic or abiotic surfaces enclosed in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances produced by the microbial cells themselves. Microbes form biofilms to overcome stresses such as nutritional depletion, antibiotics, and oxygen depletion. Biofilms are a fascinating topic of study owing to their significant applications in the environment, industry, and health. Latest developments in molecular and biochemical techniques allow scientists to understand the structure, function, and development of microbial biofilms. Although biofilms are known to cause adverse effects in clinical and industrial fields, many biofilms have shown beneficial characteristics for industries such as food and agriculture. The formation of biofilms involves five main steps. 1) attachment to the surface, 2) colonization of the microorganisms, 3) development of the bacterial colonies and production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), 4) maturation, which is the formation of a three-dimensional stable community, and 5) active dispersal, where microorganisms detach from the surface and return to their planktonic state. Research shows that certain strains of Enterococcus spp. (E. casseliflavus, E. faecalis, E. faecium), Bacillus spp. (B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. brevis, B. licheniformis, Bacillus polymyxa, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens), Pseudomonas spp. (P. fluorescens, P. putida and P. chlororaphis), Lactobacillus spp. (L. casei, L. paracasei, L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. reuteri) and Acetobacter aceti etc. have led to the formation of biofilm that contains beneficial characteristics.
The present research studies are done to study and improve the applications of biofilms in agriculture. This has become an important topic because of the immense potential of biofilms in crop development and protection. Biofilms play a huge role in the colonization of surfaces of roots, shoots, and soil of certain plants, and they allow proliferation in their niche while improving the soil fertility. Even though there are many research articles published on general microbial biofilms, there is very little published data on the biofilm formations of microbes that have agricultural importance and their associations with the ecosystem. Biofilms could be used as biofertilizers, in bioremediation and for nutrient mobilization when applied at high cell densities.
The biofilm’s biochemical, antimicrobial, and biotechnological characteristics make it a crucial candidate in research in agriculture. In situ biofilm generation or fiddling with naturally occurring biofilms are both intriguing technologies for the agriculture sector because they may accomplish a variety of functions with just one inoculation. These technologies can be used to improve soil and reduce damage to the environment through agricultural waste. The establishment of the applied inoculation in the soil and root inoculation depends significantly on the formation of beneficial biofilms. Multispecies biofilm formation is also an important topic as they are capable of producing bioactive compounds or new types of polysaccharides of a different composition when compared with biofilms formed by single species. This mechanism could be used for agricultural and industrial purposes. Biofilms are also able to improve soil quality and its physical properties because of their composition of polysaccharides. More studies should be conducted in the future to fully comprehend and close knowledge gaps about the promising elements associated with biofilms in the field of agriculture.

Figure 1: Steps in biofilm formation

Figure 1: Steps in biofilm formation

Yin, W., Wang, Y., Liu, L. and He, J., 2019. Biofilms: The Microbial “Protective Clothing” in Extreme Environments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(14), p.3423.
In text reference; (Yin et al.,2019)

References
Ghiasian, M., 2020. Microbial biofilms: Beneficial applications for sustainable agriculture. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, pp.145-155.
Velmourougane, K., Prasanna, R. and Saxena, A., 2017. Agriculturally important microbial biofilms: Present status and future prospects. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 57(7), pp.548-573.
Yin, W., Wang, Y., Liu, L. and He, J., 2019. Biofilms: The Microbial “Protective Clothing” in Extreme Environments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(14), p.3423.
Solanki, M., Solanki, A., Kumari, B., Kashyap, B. and Singh, R., 2020. Plant and soil-associated biofilm-forming bacteria: Their role in green agriculture. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Microbial Biofilms, pp.151-164.

Jpg image courtesy;
Micropia.nl. 2022. Biofilm. [online] Available at: <https://www.micropia.nl/en/discover/microbiology/biofilm/> [Accessed 10 September 2022].

Blue Carbon Eco System – Kelp Forest

Kelp Forests are underwater ecosystems formed in shallow water by the dense growth of several different species known as kelps, which are large brown algae. Among the algae, kelp forests have earned the nickname “blue carbon” for their superpower to remove more than 170 metric tons of the carbon released into the air each year.
Kelp sporophytes release millions of spores. These tiny spores then grow into tiny male or female gametophytes, which can produce either sperm or eggs. After fertilization occurs, the free-floating embryos quickly grip the ocean floor and develop into mature plants.
Kelp forests are found along rocky shorelines, mainly on the Pacific coast, stretching from Alaska to Baja California. They grow further from the tropics than sea grass beds, coral reefs and mangrove forests, meaning that they don’t overlap with those ecosystems. Kelps develop in cold, nutrient-rich waters. They attach to the seafloor and eventually grow to the water’s surface where they rely on sunlight to generate food and energy.
Kelp forests of the Channel Islands experience both warm currents from the south and cold-water current from the north. This mixing of current creates a highly productive system and a diversity of organisms that can only be found over the California coast. Similar to the above ecosystems, they are very important for biodiversity as they provide an underwater habitat to thousands of marine species of fish, invertebrates and other algae. Also, they form a dense barrier between coastlines and damaging waves, providing food and shelter to thousands of marine animal species, as well as other algae.

Figure1: Seal swimming in kelp forest

Figure1: Seal swimming in kelp forest

There are numerous natural impacts as well as human activities that affect kelp forest environments. Diverse natural factors that influence kelp forest stability are grazing by fishes, sea urchins (Sea urchins can destroy entire kelp forests at a rate of 30 feet (9 m) per month by moving in herds) and crustaceans, plant competition, and storms. Human activities also impact the health of kelp forests through kelp harvesting, coastal development, sedimentation, pollution, and fishing.
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, The Nature Conservancy, University of California Los Angeles, and the University of California Santa Barbara have launched the world’s largest map of kelp forest canopies extending from Baja California, Mexico to the Oregon-Washington border. This then developed into a cost-effective, innovative online visualization tool to improve kelp forest mapping and monitoring, which is now housed on https://kelpwatch.org/ as Kelpwatch.

Figure 2: Open-source web tool - Kelpwatch

Figure 2: Open-source web tool – Kelpwatch

Kelpwatch is a web tool that uses machine learning and remote sensing science to display the kelp forest canopies and analyze the changes it undergoes over time. This mapping tool has been launched amid major, unprecedented declines in many kelp forest ecosystems, which provide crucial services to both humans and nature.

References
https://phys.org/news/2022-04-world-largest-kelp-forest-canopies.html
https://onetreeplanted.org/blogs/stories/kelp-forest-facts
https://oceana.org/marine-life/kelp-forest/
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/oceans/kelp-forests.htm
https://voices.uchicago.edu/dfiwellnews/2019/09/04/surprising-help-from-kelp-and-the-bacteria-who-support-them/

Image Courtesy
https://onetreeplanted.org/blogs/stories/kelp-forest-facts
https://phys.org/news/2022-04-world-largest-kelp-forest-canopies.html

How Microalgae Can Save the Planet?

The world has encountered a food and energy crisis due to accelerated population growth and the depletion of finite fossil fuels. Currently, fossil fuel resources are not regarded as sustainable and their continued consumption is raising severe ecological, economic and environmental questions. Microalgae have recently attracted considerable interest worldwide due to their extensive application potential in the renewable energy, biopharmaceutical, and nutraceutical industries. Actually, microalgae are biorefineries where biomass is converted into a variety of products like biofuels, food and feed supplements, fertilizer, pharmaceuticals, and other products.
Microalgae are ubiquitous, unicellular or simple multicellular, prokaryotic or eukaryotic, photosynthetic microscopic organisms. Even though there are more than 50,000 species exist, only a limited number, of around 30,000, have been studied and analyzed. They may be autotrophic, heterotrophic, or both. Prokaryotes like Cyanobacteria and eukaryotes including Green algae and Diatoms are some examples for microalgae. Dense accumulations of microscopic algal or cyanobacterial cells in water bodies resulting from high nutrient contents are known as algal blooms.
Microalgae are the missing solution to fight climate change mainly occurred due to anthropogenic CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. Biological CO2 fixation will be the economical and environmentally viable technology of the future. Compared to terrestrial plants, microalgae have faster growth rates and their CO2 fixation efficiency is also between 10 and 50 times higher. When using microalgae for CO2 mitigation, no additional CO2 is created, while nutrient utilization is achieved in a continuous fashion leading to the production of biofuels and other secondary metabolites. Therefore, it can be coupled with biofuel production and wastewater treatment. Routinely used microalgal and cyanobacterial species for CO2 mitigation are Anabaena sp., Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella sp., Scenedesmus sp., Spirulina sp., and Euglena sp.

Figure 1: Different types of microalgae growing systems for CO2 mitigation

Figure 1: Different types of microalgae growing systems for CO2 mitigation

Microalgae biomass is considered to be a suitable feedstock for biofuel production including biodiesel, butanol, bioethanol, biogas, bio-oil, and jet fuel. Microalgal biofuels overcome a number of the shortcomings of first- and second-generation biofuels, as they produce considerably higher biomass yields (20-30 times) with lower resource inputs than other feedstocks and they are able to grow under conditions unsuitable for crop plants. Bioelectricity also can be generated from microalgae. Algal Fuel Cells are bioelectric devices that use photosynthetic organisms to turn light and biochemical energy into electrical energy.
Microalgae can be used to treat industrial, agricultural and domestic wastewater. They can remove the pollutants simultaneously while utilizing solar energy for their growth and they are able to grow in the arid environment and highly saline water. Cultivation of microalgae in wastewater does not require oxygen supply. Harvested biomass also can be used to produce high-value pigments, fish and animal feed, biofertilizers, and bioplastics. Microalgae can be used in agriculture as biofertilizers, a promising strategy to reduce dependency on agrochemicals, biostimulants, biocontrol agents, soil conditioners, and organic fertilizers.
Microalgae possess high nutritional value. They contain high concentrations of proteins, lipids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and bioactive carbohydrates such as polysaccharides. Also, they are especially valuable for their high content of essential omega-3 fatty acids. So, they are used as food and feed additives and supplements. Also, they contain antioxidants including pigments such as carotenes, chlorophylls, and phycobiliproteins important for health and cosmetic applications. Spirulina, Chlorella, Dunaliella, and Haematococcus are some microalgae widely used as food supplements, feed, and nutraceuticals. There are microalgal bio-based materials such as microalgal bioplastics and algae carbon fiber.
So, do you still think of microalgae as pond scum? How will you embrace algae in the future?

Figure 2: Microalgae-based food supplements

Figure 2: Microalgae-based food supplements

References:
Khan, M.I., Shin, J.H. & Kim, J.D. The promising future of microalgae: current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products. Microb Cell Fact 17, 36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0879-x

Image courtesy:
Featured image:

https://www.wur.nl/upload_mm/d/b/3/81bc4b99-4c6f-4e2f-b1ef-78e0b0998801_algen_micro_shutterstock_101601940_1000_2c1552a9_750x400.jpg
Figure 1:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/73d4a44f-b9b4-499c-a3f5-137f689aae2a/elsc1269-fig-0002-m.jpg
Figure 2:
https://www.israel21c.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Picture6-1-768×363.jpg

Into the world of Auto-luminescent Plants

Anyone who has watched the Avatar movie gets their breath taken in when the movie brings you through their beautiful world, especially with different varieties of glowing flora and fauna. Recent discoveries and findings have shown that it is not very far where people will be able to build something very similar in real life. In nature even at present, we can easily find a few animals, microbes like fireflies and mushrooms that can glow due to their bioluminescence. This phenomenon occurs when enzymes react on luciferins within the organism, resulting in releasing energy in the form of light. However, bioluminescence does not occur naturally in plants.
Scientists believe that these bioluminescent plants will not only take us to a gorgeous completely new world, bust also will aid tremendously in exploring and studying plants. This technology will help scientists to monitor how different hormones act inside plant tissues and will help in observing how plants respond to various abiotic (e.g., droughts, salinity) and biotic (e.g., pathogens, herbivores) stresses.
Previously, what researchers have done was, incorporating enzymes required for the synthesis of bioluminescence and luciferins into nanoparticles and insert them into plants. Also, several other researchers have tried inserting bacterial genes that cause bioluminescence into plants. However, those efforts were not successful because of the high cost entangled with the nanotechnology and the luminance being quite weak when using bacterial bioluminescence genes.
The latest research takes a different approach, which uses the process of which fungi illuminate. In 2018, it was discovered that a fungal species Neonothopanus nambi luciferase has a biochemical pathway that produce bioluminescence, similar to that of the firefly luciferase. Fungi use α-pyrone 3-hydroxyhispidin which is oxidized by luciferase in the presence of oxygen which results in the emission of green light (~ 520 nm). It was found that the expression of only a few genes (only 3) from the fungal bioluminescent system is sufficient to obtain considerable level of glowing in eukaryotes.

Figure1: Bioluminescence in tobacco plant leaves

Figure1: Bioluminescence in tobacco plant leaves

In the year 2019, Sarkisyan and the team had inserted four genes from the fungus into the DNA of tobacco plants. These genes are related to the enzymes that convert caffeic acid into a luciferin which emits energy as a green light visible to the naked eye. Also they had discovered that the light emitted was 10 times brighter than that of bacterial genes. According to them, the site of expression changes with the growth of the plant. They also had discovered that the brightness reduces with the senescence of the leaves, but there was an increase in the glow at sites where the leaves were damaged. The highest luminescence was observed in flowers.
Investigators hope to take these plants to the market after making the plants brighter and with approved safety regulations. The next target of this team is to insert the fungal genes into the plant’s genome that will be activated by certain hormones. Moreover, it is believed that the tissues at which the hormones are active at different times will show luminescence.

References:
Fleiss, A. and Sarkisyan, K.S., 2019. A brief review of bioluminescent systems (2019). Current genetics, 65(4), pp.877-882.

Image courtesy
Featured image:

https://sharebiology.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/glowing-tobacco.jpg
Figure 01: Planta/MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/apr/27/scientists-create-glowing-plants-using-mushroom-genes

Photosynthesis in a changing global climate

Climate is defined as the weather conditions prevailing in an area over a long period of time. Global climate change is the long-term alteration of weather patterns in the planet that results in elevated temperature, carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, changing rain and wind patterns, melting of glaciers and rising seawater levels. Climate models predict that the global average temperature will rise by 0.2 ˚C in the next two decades in every climatic zone including tropical, temperate, and polar regions.
Photosynthesis is the process by which plants use sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to create energy in the form of sugar and produce molecular oxygen as a by-product. The carbon cycle in the earth is driven by this process of photosynthesis. This reaction happens mainly in green plants and in some other photosynthetic microorganisms. There are mainly two steps in the photosynthetic process. The first one is the light-dependent reaction where energy is stored in ATP (Adenosine triphosphate) and NADPH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) while producing oxygen (O2) as a by-product. The next step is independent of light and is called the Calvin Cycle where sugar molecules are formed by fixing CO2. Furthermore, there are three types of photosynthetic mechanisms called C3 (in cotton, spinach, soybeans, etc.), C4 (in maize, sugarcane, sorghum, etc.), and CAM (in cacti, pineapple, etc.).

Figure 01

Figure 01: Photosynthetic reaction that happened inside the chloroplast

CO2 is a greenhouse gas that absorbs longer wavelength radiation and traps heat around the earth’s surface. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. But when high CO2 levels are present in the atmosphere this eventually leads to excessive global warming.
Carbon dioxide levels today are higher than at any point compared to the past. The levels are rising mostly because of the burning of fossil fuels by humans. The last time the atmospheric CO₂ amounts were this high was more than 3 million years ago. Therefore, we are going back to where plants or small algae began photosynthesis. At the beginning of life on earth, the oxygen concentration was very low in the atmosphere. C3 photosynthesis is thought to have arisen at this time.
The majority of the plant species use C3 photosynthesis in which the first and most stable carbon compound containing three carbon atoms is produced. That’s why it is called the C3 mechanism. The RUBP (Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate) carboxylase enzyme which catalyzes carboxylation in the Calvin cycle has evolved in the primeval pre-photosynthetic atmosphere which contained high CO2 and no O2. Therefore, this climatic condition is favorable for plants to photosynthesize more efficiently and grow faster which leads to high crop productivity. Under well-watered and highly fertilized conditions, most C3 plants grow about 30% faster when the CO2 concentration reaches 600 – 750 ppm range but a little or no increased growth is seen in C4 plants which fix carbon dioxide into a 4 carbon compounds in order to enter the C3 or Calvin Cycle.
If CO2 concentration continues to increase at this rate, after a particular level plant photosynthetic rate will become limited due to the increase in atmospheric temperature. Under high-temperature conditions, plants tend to close their stomata (microscopic openings in the epidermis of leaves that facilitate gas exchange) to prevent desiccation. In the daytime, photosynthesis happens and thereby CO2 levels are depleted inside the photosynthetic cells and are not restored as stomata are closed. In such situations, the Rubisco enzyme binds with oxygen and leads to a phenomenon called photorespiration. It results in the release of CO2 with the utilization of ATP. This is energetically costly and a wasteful process that happens in C3 plants. Under elevated CO2 levels and high temperature, C4 plants are benefited since they are adapted to warm and high-temperature environments. These plants effectively maintain the CO2 levels in their photosynthetic cells and are adapted to prevent photorespiration.

Figure 02

Figure 02: Leaf anatomy of C3 and C4 plants

Even though CO2 is much more important in photosynthesis and increases the rate of reaction up to a certain level the nutrients, and other factors act as limiting factors for the photosynthetic process. Therefore, the photosynthetic rate quickly becomes constrained by the less nutrient availability. Soil is eroded due to the low vegetation cover in lands and most of the nutrients are leaching out from the soil and it becomes poor in nutrients. The presence of pollutants in the atmosphere and low-level ozone can also indirectly reduce the net photosynthetic rate.
A better understanding of the above mentioned phenomena is crucial in studying natural ecosystems, in conserving a balanced ecosystem and in providing high crop productivity to feed the rising human population. If the above mentioned phenomena continue to happen in the future, the C4 and CAM plants may be benefited except the C3 plants even though C4 and CAM mechanisms are more energetically costly than the C3 mechanism. Since most of the plants on the earth are C3 plants, change in global climate patterns has a major influence on the plant community and their survival. Therefore, it is required to minimize these climatic changes while improving plants to adapt to this changing environment. To protect plants from climate change, personal action is more important than ever. Practices such as organic farming, eating less meat, producing clean energy, or even less use of vehicles can help save the planet from climate change and ensure the survival of plants that help us survive on earth.

References:
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/climate-change/
https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/climate-change-impacts/predictions-
Plant Physiology and Development by Eduardo Zeiger, Lincoln Taiz, Ian Max Moller, Angus Murphy – sixth edition.

Image courtesy

Featured image: https://357h4a1tedstsbee1xvf35r5-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/climate-change.jpg
Image 01: https://biologydictionary.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Photosynthesis-in-plant.jpg
Image 02:https://cnx.org/resources/ef7d8f88785507a73eebee86af5036a8/C3_C4_leaves.jpg

The Real Potential of Algae Biotechnology

The global population is gradually increasing over time. In 2050, it is estimated that the world population will exceed 10 billion people. Since the existing agricultural systems, land, and natural resources are already maximally exploited, the problem lies in how to feed the increasing population. Climatic changes, environmental pollution, and urbanization have become a great challenge to future agricultural processes. The global temperature rising, extreme weather, changing climatic patterns and loss of arable lands have driven the world to investigate more sustainable pathways to fulfill the global needs in an eco-friendly manner.

The introduction of “Algae Biotechnology'' is the newest trend that allows us to overcome these problems in a sustainable and eco-friendly manner. Algal biotechnology is a technology developed using algae. This can be divided into microalgae and macroalgae technology. Here I mainly focus on the applications of microalgae technology. Photosynthetic microalgae are one of the most abandoned communities in the world that can be identified in a vast range of habitats. According to the statistics, more than 200,000 species with numerous ecological adaptations are available in the world.

Figure 1: Different microalgae species

Figure 1: Different microalgae species

These phototrophic algae have the advantage of using sunlight to fix atmospheric carbon and reduce their reliance on sugar for fermentation. Many species of microalgae can grow rapidly even under extreme conditions. When thinking about large-scale cultivations, unlike plants, the algae can be cultured in the ponds or photobioreactors by using non-arable lands with less freshwater or even with seawater or wastewater.

Figure 2: Different Methods of growing microalgae

Figure 2: Different Methods of growing microalgae

The photosynthetic efficiency of the algae is very high compared to crop plants. For example, we can compare algae with sugarcane. One of the most productive plants on the planet is sugarcane, and it can accumulate up to 25 tons of biomass per acre per year. However about 80 percent of that biomass is cellulose, which is not very useful in biofuel production. Algae can accumulate at least twice that biomass, up to 50 tons per acre per year, and that’ll be beneficial. So, we can consider this as a great source to open new chances in order to fulfill a vast number of global needs. Yet most of the people in the world are not aware of the potential of this great source. Therefore the implementation of these industrial applications is relatively low at the present.
Now we will focus on some applications of microalgae biotechnology. Algae biotechnology can be used in producing food and nutraceuticals. Microalgae can act as a source of nutrients, minerals, trace elements, and other bioactive compounds. These are rich sources of bulk protein, carbohydrates, and lipids. With less recourse and effort, by implementing these techniques high-quality protein for human and animal consumption can be produced.

The secondary metabolites obtained from algae can be used to produce expensive pharmaceuticals and pigments for the apparel industry. Another best application of algae biotechnology is the production of biopolymers, bioplastics, and bulk chemicals. Now our planet is almost covered in plastic trash. Plastic was only invented a little more than 60 years ago and yet today there are already 17 trillion pounds of plastic on this planet. This may lead to huge environmental damage. Therefore, the alternatives for petrochemical-based plastics sources are in high demand. Algae have the potential to be an economically viable feedstock for bioplastics production because these biomass compounds such as starch, carbohydrates, and lipids can be converted into plastics. So, in this way, we can produce biodegradable plastics and polymers efficiently at a low cost. Biomass-derived chemicals 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), levulinic acid, furfurals, sugar alcohols, lactic acid, succinic acid, and phenols, are known as platform chemicals. These are used for producing a variety of important chemicals on an industrial scale. Bio-based bulk chemicals are a good substituent for fossil oil-based bulk chemicals.

Moreover, the presence of emerging contaminants in the environment is a potential risk to ecosystems and human health at environmentally relevant concentrations. Microalgae have the potential to detoxify organic and inorganic pollutants. Coupling of nutrient and emerging contaminants removal by microalgae has the potential to provide more cost-effective and efficient wastewater treatment while meeting both environmental and human health protection goals.

So, algae biotechnology is a great opportunity to fulfill essential human needs while protecting the ecosystems and recovering the environmental issues. I realize it as a key to open the door that blocks the way to the green world. In my opinion, we should pay more attention to these types of alternatives to meet our goals of sustainability.

References
Michele Fabris, Raffaela M. Abbriano,Mathieu Pernice, Donna L. Sutherland, Audrey S. Commault, Christopher C. Hall1, Leen Labeeuw1, Janice I. McCauley, Unnikrishnan Kuzhiuparambil, Parijat Ray, Tim Kahlke, Peter J. Ralph. (2020). Emerging Technologies in Algal Biotechnology: Toward the Establishment of a Sustainable, Algae-Based Bioeconomy. Frontiers In Plant Science

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.00279/full

Image Courtesy:
Featured image:
https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/415760-lab-grown-algae-the-future-of-food
Figure 1:

https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/ezine/8639701/Microalgae__Underestimated_All-Rounders.html
Figure 2:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/210202714_Application_of_computational_fluid_dynamics_for_modeling_and_designing_photobioreactors_for_microalgae_production_A_review